Iowa State University

Iowa State University

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences

Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences

Got a question or comment?
Contact us at 515-294-4477 (geology) or 515-294-4758 (meteorology)
geology@iastate.edu
Meteorology Undergrad Program
Meteorology Graduate Program

Carl Jacobson
Chair
Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences
253 Science I
Ames, Iowa 50011

FAX: 515-294-6049

William Gallus
Professor-in-Charge
Meteorology Program
3010 Agronomy Hall
515-294-2270


MWR-CDGA.2.html

 

Iselin, J.P., W. J. Gutowski and J.M. Prusa, 2003: Tracer advection using dynamic grid adaptation and MM5. Mon. Wea. Rev. (submitted).

A dynamic grid adaptation (DGA) technique is used to numerically simulate tracer transport at meso- and regional scales. The grid adaptation scheme is designed to maximize heuristic characteristics of a "good" grid. The advective solver used in conjunction with the DGA is the multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm (MPDATA). The DGA results for regional tracer transport are compared against results generated using the leap- frog as well as MPDATA advection schemes with uniformly spaced, static grids. Wind fields for all tracer transport algorithms are provided by the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model, version 5 (MM5). A mesoscale sized test case with idealized initial condition and wind field clearly shows qualitatively and quantitatively the advantage of using the dynamic adaptive grid, which is a marked reduction in numerical error. These results are further corroborated by more realistic test cases that used NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data from March 6-11, 1992 to set initial and boundary conditions for: (i) a mesoscale sized, 24 hour simulation with an idealized initial tracer field; and (ii) a regional, five day simulation with water vapor field initialized from the reanalysis data but then treated as a passive tracer. A result of interest is that MPDATA substantially outperforms the leap-frog method (central to MM5) in all of our test cases. We conclude that with dynamic grid adaptation, results with approximately the same accuracy as a uniform grid may be obtained using only a quarter of the grid points of the uniform grid MPDATA simulations. Compared to results generated using the leap-frog method on a uniform grid, the DGA does even better.