Iowa State University

Iowa State University

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences

Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences

Got a question or comment?
Contact us at 515-294-4477 (geology) or 515-294-4758 (meteorology)
geology@iastate.edu
meteorology@iastate.edu

Carl Jacobson
Chair
Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences
253 Science I
Ames, Iowa 50011

FAX: 515-294-6049

William Gallus
Professor-in-Charge
Meteorology Program
3010 Agronomy Hall
515-294-2270

Abstract - Pan-Arctic

 

Wei, H., W.J. Gutowski Jr., C.J. Vorosmarty and B. M. Fekete, 2002: Calibration and validation of a regional climate model for pan-Arctic hydrologic simulation. J. Climate.

A number of polar data sets have recently been released involving in situ measurement, satellite retrievals and reanalysis output that provide new opportunity to evaluate regional climate in the Arctic. These data have been used to assess a one-year pan-Arctic simulation (October 1985 - September 1986) performed by a version of the Penn State/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Fifth-Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5) that incorporated the NCAR Land Surface model (LSM) and a simple thermodynamic sea ice model to investigate interactions between the land surface and atmosphere. The model's standard cloud scheme using relative humidity was replaced by one using simulated cloud liquid water and ice water after a set of short, test simulations revealed excessive cloud cover.

Model validation concentrates on factors relevant to the water cycle: atmospheric circulation, temperature, surface radiation fluxes, precipitation and runoff. The model captures general patterns of atmospheric circulation over land. RMS differences from HARA rawinsonde winds at 850 hPs are smaller for the simulation (9.8 m/s) than for the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (10.5 m/s) that supplies the model's boundary conditions. For continental watersheds, the model simulates well annual-average surface air temperature (bias < 2KC) and precipitation (bias < 0.5 mm/d). However, the model has a summer dry bias with monthly precipitation error occasionally exceeding 1 mm/d. The model simulates the approximate magnitude of spring runoff surge, but annual runoff is less than observed (18 - 48% among the continental watersheds). Analysis of precipitation and surface air temperature errors indicates that further improvements in both evapotranspiration and precipitation are needed to simulate well the full annual cycle.